The conversation among cabinet members indicates a debate over potential U.S. intervention in Iran, with some members favoring a strong approach while others advocate for caution and a balanced strategy. The discussion also reveals a sense of unpredictability associated with the President’s decision-making process.
[LEAKED SIGNAL CONVERSATION]
March 10 Hegseth (11:44 am ET): 📣 We’re looking at a 65% chance of POTUS intervention in Iran according to Goldman. I’m ready to flex some American muscle 💪
Rubio (11:52 am ET): Noted Pete. But let’s not forget the ripple effects of this action. 🌊
Gabbard (11:58 am ET): 🇷🇺 Mother Russia agrees with Rubio. Kidding, but we should proceed with caution - not everything needs to be won by brute force.
Waltz (12:20 pm ET): All valid points. We need a balanced approach to this situation.
March 11 Vance (14:00 pm ET): 🏆 Victory will be ours if we play our cards right. Trump’s chess game has always been unpredictable.
Hegseth (15:05pm ET): Game of Thrones has nothing on us, eh? Pivot from being pawns to kings. 👑
Rubio (15:15pm ET): Not sure if we’re in a HBO series or a real-life government. 📺 😂
Bessent (15:20pm ET): Can we stop with the Game of Thrones references? Also, let’s keep the focus. 🎯
March 12 Miller (10:45 am ET): I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I agree with Rubio. I think he’s doing a good job at not letting the insanity affect him. Or he’s hiding it very well.
Witkoff (11:05am ET): 😂 Spot on, Stephen.
Ratcliffe (11:10 am ET): Can we get back to Iran? This isn’t a comedy club.
Wiles (11:15 am ET): Agreed! I just received an update. We need to refocus our energies.
Kent (11:30 am ET): I have to say, Marco’s playing it cool as a cucumber. I don’t know if he could handle all this hot air.
Rubio (11:35 am ET): Now look who’s making jokes, Kent. The heat’s on, let’s get back to work. 🔥
