The leaked conversation among cabinet members centers around athlete Jalen Hurts’ decision to not attend the Super Bowl White House visit, with speculation about his motivations ranging from political to personal, and even jesting about potential dissatisfaction with the White House food.
March 15 Hegseth (11:44 am ET): Just caught the news. Jalen Hurts ditches Eagles during the Super Bowl White House visit. Interesting move. What are we thinking TEAM? How’s the weather on your side?
Vance (12.13pm ET): Another athlete picking politics over sports. So, it’s not about the game anymore, huh? Interesting times we live in. Sun is shining here, Pete.
Waltz (13:48pm ET): Unusual move, indeed. Is this about policy, personal grievances, or something else entirely? Not too different from navigating through cabinet meetings, eh?
Rubio (14:20pm ET): Who knows, maybe he just doesn’t like the food? 🍔🌭🍗😅
Hegseth (14:30pm ET): Thought it was about the game and not the Gala dinner. 😂 Maybe we need better chefs at the white house.
Stephen Miller (14:45pm ET): Are we seriously discussing food preferences now? 😒🙄
Gabbard (15:01pm ET): Hey, food is a universal language. Maybe we can get some Russian recipes to mix things up? 😏
Rubio (15:05pm ET): Well, I do make a mean borscht, Tulsi. ☺️
Vance (15:20pm ET): Alright, let’s reel it back. As much as I’d love to chat about culinary pursuits, we’ve got work to do.
Waltz (15:30pm ET): Agreed. Back to the Jalen Hurts situation. We need a strategy for these athletes using their platform to make political statements.
Ratcliffe (15:45pm ET): Yes, in the middle of all this locker-room talk 🏈, let’s not forget the real issue here: athletes shaping political narrative.
Witkoff (16:05pm ET): Let’s keep our eyes on the ball, gentlemen. And Tulsi. 🏀🧐
Susie Wiles (16:10pm ET): Absolutely, Steve. There are always ways to turn the narrative. We just have to find the right angle.
Kent (16:20pm ET): Precisely! Also, anyone for wings tonight? 🍗🍗
